Custom Search
Showing posts with label Healthy Living. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Healthy Living. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 February 2011

Top 6 Calorie-Burning Workouts

0 comments

UNITED STATES

While there is no secret formula for losing weight (It all comes down to simple math: You must burn more calories than you consume), there are smarter, faster ways to achieve your goals. The following six workouts are proven to be the most heart-pumping, sweat-producing, and consequently most efficient calorie-burning and weight-loss-inducing exercises out there. Do one, or a combination of many, regularly, and watch the weight fall off.

1. Kickboxing: 800 calories per hour
Kickboxing offers a great full-body workout because it requires you to use every major muscle group and includes interval training. Your heart rate will soar and stabilize several times throughout the class, which is optimal for weight loss. 24 Hour Fitness clubs report that attendees of their Turbo Kick classes can burn up to 800 calories in one hour-long class.

2. Biking: 700 calories per hour
You can burn up to 700 calories at your average cycling class or take to the road on your own to enjoy fresh air to boot! Just make sure you keep a pace of about 14 to 16 miles per hour to reach the 700-calorie goal.

3. Zumba: 500 or more calories per hour
Who knew an hour of dancing could produce such results?! Because this Latin-inspired dance workout uses the principles of interval training and resistance exercise, the workout will boost your metabolism considerably, according to FitnessZumba.com. However, like any fitness regimen, the number of calories burned varies from person to person depending on weight, sex, current fitness level, and how a hard a person works out. Still the massive weight loss and toning benefits of hip-swishing and shimmying make this dance workout one of the most popular today.

4. Jumping Rope: 780 calories per hour
Only got ten minutes? You can still squeeze in cardio with this highly effective activity, which can have you burning 130 calories every ten minutes (or 780 calories per hour). According to MedicineNet.com, you’d have to run an eight-minute mile to burn as many calories as jumping rope for the same amount of time, making it a good choice for someone who is starting a fitness regime and may not have the endurance to maintain a fast running speed for an extended period of time. If you have limited space and time, jumping rope is the most efficient way to see results. In addition, the high-impact nature of this workout means you’ll add bone mass, increasing your bone health, according to 24 Hour Fitness Club's Website and BoneHealth.com, while you lose fat.

5. Aerobic Step Classes: 600 calories per hour
Aerobic step classes are high-intensity and high-impact, meaning you’ll burn fat and calories. The number of calories burned depends on how high the step is, but using just a six-inch platform can allow you to burn up to 600 calories in one hour-long class.

6. Running: 650 calories per hour
According to WebMD's calorie calculator, a 145-pound person who maintains a 10-minute mile for one hour can burn up to 650 calories. However, running consistently for an hour can be challenging if it isn't a part of your current exercise regimen. You can work up to this goal and increase your cardiovascular fitness by adding walking intervals throughout your workout. For instance, run for three minutes and then walk briskly for one minute. This practice will increase your endurance, lower your heart-rate recovery time, and burn fat

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/health/the-top-6-calorie-burning-workouts-2444723/




RELATED TOPIC

FULLSTORY...

The Best Calorie-Burning Sex Moves

0 comments

UNITED STATES

You've probably heard people joke about sex being a good workout and all, but figured it only applies to couples with, let's just say, a lot of imagination (and stamina). But the truth is, sex can be a great workout -- for everyone. Try these moves to better your body (and your sex life).

Foreplay Fitness This one's easy: While you're kissing, vigorously massage your partner's head, back of the neck and shoulders. Giving a massage burns approximately 80 calories an hour -- not to mention it makes your significant other pretty damn happy. Win-win!

Interval Training Trainers are constantly praising the benefits of interval training. Apparently, adding different exercises and intensities (walk, jog, run, sprint) to your workout can double your calorie burn. So mix it up -- alternate positions and work up a sweat, and you can burn as many as 385 calories an hour. Plus, the sex will be hotter (and so will your bod).

Missionary Magic Turns out, this old standby gives a two-way workout: It tones the core (of the person on the bottom) and the upper body (for the one on top). Here's how:

Ladies, as your man thrusts toward you, lift your hips slightly, contract your core and meet his action with an equal thrust. You can also rotate your hips in a circular fashion to engage more of your core muscles (and get more pleasure!). After a few minutes, your abs will feel like you just did 100 sit-ups. Also, doing Kegels as he thrusts will work your core even harder.

Guys: Prop yourself up on your hands, and instead of locking your elbows, try bending them slightly. Holding that position as you move your lower body (get it?) will leave your chest, shoulders and triceps burning.

Standing Sexercise Essentially, the guy stands and holds his partner up (and she wraps her legs around him), so his entire body is working to stabilize the both of you. With all those muscles working, his heart rate will increase, so he'll burn more fat and calories. Ladies, on the other hand, get a killer inner-thigh workout.

Cowgirl Calisthenics Girls, instead of your basic cowgirl (where you kneel over him), make it a bit more interesting (and a much better workout) by coming up onto your feet as if you're doing a deep squat while you're on top. You'll work your butt, hips and thighs, and your increased heart rate will help burn more fat and calories -- up to 200 in 30 minutes.

By Kristin Koch for TheNest.com




RELATED TOPIC

FULLSTORY...

Monday, 25 October 2010

AIG CEO Benmosche has cancer, in treatment

0 comments

UNITED STATES


American International Group said on Monday Chief Executive Robert Benmosche has cancer and an unclear prognosis, casting a shadow on the bailed-out insurer as it undergoes a restructuring.

AIG did not disclose what kind of cancer Benmosche, 66, has but said he is undergoing "aggressive chemotherapy." He is thought to have been recently diagnosed, although it is not clear exactly when. Benmosche said in a statement he felt fine and that he had started the chemotherapy last week.

The insurance company has had four chief executives since mid-2008. That turnover is evidence of the turmoil the company has faced after massive derivative positions forced it to receive more than $180 billion of U.S. government support.

In recent months AIG's outlook has improved. In September, the company came up with a plan to pay back the roughly $100 billion that it still owes U.S. taxpayers.

On Friday, AIG sold $17.9 billion of shares in AIA, its Asian life insurance arm, bringing the company a step closer to repaying the United States.

"Had this happened three or four months ago it would have occasioned more fright for a path forward for the organization," said Clark Troy, an analyst at Aite Group.

"Now I think it's more of a question of finding the right person and concern for Benmosche personally."

Benmosche said his long-term prognosis would not be clear until he had a couple more months of treatment.

The U.S. Treasury Department said it was informed about Benmosche's health earlier on Monday.

In a letter to AIG employees, Benmosche said he intended to maintain a normal schedule and to work until his intended retirement in 2012.

The company's stock edged lower to $40.80 in thin after-hours trading from a $41.10 close on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock is up 37 percent this year, against a gain of 11.5 percent for the S&P insurance index.

"Investors should be worried about this. He's going to keep working while he's getting chemotherapy. Most people wouldn't find that very tenable," said Sean Egan, principal of Egan-Jones Ratings Co, which rates AIG's debt.

"Keeping him in place might be reasonable in the short-term, but I question if it's in the company's longer-term interests," Egan said.

AIG said it was engaged in contingency planning in case Benmosche needed a substitute.

The board was planning a conference call on Wednesday to discuss succession, the Wall Street Journal reported. A director might step in as interim CEO if Benmosche had to stop working temporarily, WSJ said on its website, citing unnamed sources.

WSJ said AIG Chairman Robert "Steve" Miller, and directors Douglas Steenland and Ronald Rittenmeyer would be among possible candidates for interim CEO.

An AIG spokesman declined to comment.

Aite Group's Troy said a new permanent CEO would likely have to come from within the organization, given the complexity of challenges AIG faces.

Who that might be is far from clear, however, as Benmosche is the sole executive face of the organization. One potential candidate is executive vice president Peter Hancock, who oversees finance and risk and who joined AIG earlier this year. He has been cited in various reports as a possible successor.

UBS analyst Andrew Kligerman, however, said Jay Wintrob, chief executive of SunAmerica Financial Group, is a strong candidate. SunAmerica is the domestic life business of AIG.

"Jay Wintrob is the guy," Kligerman said. "He has got the corporate and operational talents to do the job."

AN AUTHORITATIVE PRESENCE

Benmosche has been an authoritative presence at the insurer since becoming CEO in August 2009.

He has gotten much of the credit for a turnaround that included selling foreign life unit ALICO at an attractive price to MetLife and sorting out the mess surrounding the failed sale of Asian unit AIA to the U.K.'s Prudential.

In July, Benmosche won a boardroom battle with former Chairman Harvey Golub over the failed AIA sale. Reports indicated Benmosche had threatened to resign if Golub was not replaced.

It was the second time the former MetLife CEO had threatened to quit, the first being in November 2009 in frustration over government imposed pay limits on AIG staff.

"It's a viable, ongoing entity now. Benmosche deserves kudos for his excellent work," UBS' Kligerman said. "Now somebody with some more operational skills could certainly take on the role."

(Reuters)




RELATED TOPIC
FULLSTORY...

Thursday, 21 October 2010

New Tumor Marker May Improve Cancer Detection: Study

0 comments

UNITED STATED


A hormone receptor normally confined to the reproductive organs has been detected in malignant tumors in many parts of the body, researchers report.

Researchers from the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, working with French government scientists, say this common link may offer a new target for the early diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

They evaluated tumor tissue samples from 1,336 men and women with 11 common cancers, including prostate, breast, colon, pancreatic, lung, liver and ovarian. The analyses revealed the presence of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor in the blood vessel cells of the tumors.

This receptor is not found on blood vessels in normal tissue, with the exception of the reproductive organs, where it is present in much lower concentrations than in tumors, said the American and French researchers. (In women, FSH, which interacts with the FSH-receptor, normally helps control the menstrual cycle and egg production; in men, FSH normally helps control the production of sperm.)

Activating the FSH receptor contributes to the signaling of a protein (VEGF) that stimulates the growth of blood vessels, including those in tumors. Blocking the action of the FSH receptor may also block the signaling of VEGF.

"This new tumor marker may be used to improve cancer detection," study lead author Aurelian Radu, an assistant professor of developmental and regenerative biology at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, said in a Mount Sinai Medical Center news release.

"Tumor imaging agents that bind to the new marker could be injected in the [body's blood vessel system] and would make visible early tumors located anywhere in the body using magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, or ultrasound imaging," Radu explained.

In addition, new treatments "can be developed that will block the tumor blood supply, either by inhibiting formation of new blood vessels, blocking the blood flow by coagulation, or by destroying the existing tumor vessels."

The study appears in the Oct. 21 issue of the The New England Journal of Medicine.

This article was originally published on HealthDay News.




RELATED TOPIC
FULLSTORY...

Sex, lies and pomegranate juice focus of US legal battle

0 comments

UNITED STATED


If the claims are to be believed, pomegranate juice can change your life, preventing prostate and breast cancer, protecting against heart disease and even alleviating erectile dysfunction.

Could it be the elixir from the original fruit of the Garden of Eden? No, says the US Federal Trade Commission, which is suing the California group POM Wonderful for making "false and unsubstantiated claims" about its products.

POM has said it would challenge the FTC, setting up a high-profile battle between the maker of the popular juice and authorities over the so-called superfood which has also been purported to help fight Alzheimer's disease and arthritis and improve sperm quality.

"Any consumer who sees POM Wonderful products as a silver bullet against disease has been misled," said David Vladeck, director of the FTC's bureau of consumer protection.

The company, a unit of the Roll International group that includes Teleflora and Fiji Water, is gearing up for battle. It has filed its own lawsuit against the FTC alleging interference with its free speech rights for POM, which does not publish financial results but is believed to have sales of some 100 million dollars a year.

Even after the FTC filed its action, POM Wonderful launched a new campaign with television ads produced by French-Canadian director Francois Girard showing the sex appeal of pomegranates.

In one ad, a nearly naked actress Sonja Kinski is lounging on a bed of greenery with a snake slithering up her body. The voiceover reads: "Some scholars believe it wasn't an apple, but a ruby red, antioxidant-rich pomegranate with which Eve tempted Adam."

Another with Swedish actress Helena Mattsson links pomegranates to the legend of Aphrodite, saying the Greek goddess of love and desire declared the fruit "an aphrodisiac."

The company says it makes no claim that its juice or supplements are drugs, but just nutritious food.

"Because POM products may in fact offer the promise of better health, we believe it is important to share the research results as they become available," the company said in a statement, refusing to directly answer questions on the court case.

"This is especially true since our products do not carry the risks associated with pharmaceutical drugs. It's a shame that the government is unable to understand this fundamental distinction, and instead is wasting taxpayer resources to persecute the pomegranate."

Ivan Preston, a University of Wisconsin professor emeritus of communication and specialist in truth in advertising, said POM Wonderful appears to have overstepped the accepted bounds of advertising on the product.

"If they say in their ads, 'backed by science,' they are making a medical claim," he said.

Preston says that in order to promote medical benefits for pomegranate juice, the makers would have to go through a rigorous testing process for clearance by the Food and Drug Administration.

Although POM Wonderful said dozens of studies support its claims, the FTC said the benefits are not supported by accepted scientific standards -- using double-blind groups including one with a placebo.

According to the FTC complaint, POM executives "knew that a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, funded by POM Wonderful... showed no significant difference after 18 months between consumption of pomegranate juice and a control beverage in reducing carotid arterial wall thickness."

For prostate cancer, "the evidence relied on by respondents consisted of results from an unblinded, uncontrolled study" and the scientists said it was "controversial" whether the benefits were delivered. The FTC said other health claims also were unsubstantiated.

"The aim of POM's first ever TV advertising campaign is to educate consumers in a provocative and sensual way about the intriguing history of the pomegranate," says POM company president Matt Tupper.

"POM is proud to have explored the mythic properties of pomegranates using modern science."

But Marion Nestle, a New York University nutritionist and author, said the POM case shows "how easy it is to design studies to give you the answer you want."

"POM research demonstrates that pomegranate juice has antioxidant activity and acts as an antioxidant in the body. Of course it does," Nestle writes on her blog.

"But so does every other fruit and vegetable and what this research does not do is compare the effects of pomegranate juice to those of orange juice, for example."

This article was originally published on AFP.




RELATED TOPIC
FULLSTORY...

Monday, 18 October 2010

Drunk Driving: Is the U.S. Blood Alcohol Limit Too Liberal?

0 comments

UNITED STATED

It's a typical busy summer night at Banken, the most popular nightclub in Kristianstad, Sweden. The patio outside is uncomfortably crowded and breathing room is hard to come by. Nearly everyone at the club is holding some sort of drink and soon a group of teenagers by the bar begin taking body shots of tequila. Around 12:30 in the morning, throngs of cabs begin to line up along the sidewalk outside. Chances are that very few - if any people at all - drive home tonight. After all, this is Sweden, where the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) limit for drives is a stringently low .02 g/100 ml.

Compare that to America, where the BAC limit remains at a practically libertine .08. How much is that exactly? According University of Oklahoma Police Department's BAC Calculator, a 180-lb male registers a .08 after consuming six 12 oz. beers or five gin-and-tonics in a span of two hours. Still, having the .08 standard is a legislative improvement. In previous years some states had their limit set at .15. That would be more than eight beers within two hours.

Or look at it this way. In June, a Massachusetts state trooper and father of four was killed after pulling over a driver who reportedly registered a .20 during a breathalyzer exam. Another driver then slammed into the pulled-over car, instantly killing the trooper who was standing next to it. The lawyer for driver of the second car says his client's BAC tested at .07, which is within the legal limit. Nevertheless, both men have been charged with drunk driving, with the second driver receiving the additional charges of vehicular homicide and speeding. Both men have pleaded not guilty to the charges. According to the International Center for Alcohol Policies, only 15 other countries (including Canada and New Zealand) have the same threshold as the United States. Most European nations carry a standard of .05 or lower and a few countries, such as the Czech Republic, have zero tolerance policies. (Why are more young women involved in deadly drunk-driving crashes?)

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 11,773 people died in drunk driving related accidents in the United States in 2008. As these kinds of unnecessary deaths continue happening roughly every 45 minutes, the United States has maintained its .08 standard even as other countries across the world are attempting to lower the permitted BAC for drivers.

In Sweden, which changed its BAC threshold from .05 to .02 in 1990, the results have been dramatic. According to the World Health Organization and European Commission, of road fatalities in Sweden, roughly 16% were alcohol related. In the U.S., 31.7% of traffic fatalities were alcohol related in 2007. Other countries around the world have continued to modify their standards for "drink-driving." In Switzerland, where the limit was reduced from .08 to .05 in 2005, drunk driving deaths instantly declined. France saw similar results when it lowered its limit to .05 in 1995. Changes appear to be on the horizon in other countries as well. For example, in the past few years Denmark has discussed reducing the BAC threshold to .02.

Attitudes toward drunk driving appear to oscillate between countries. People in Sweden take drunk driving laws very seriously, says Eric Larsson, 34, a Stockholm native who moved to London five years ago. Larsson said that he found the laws in England - which allows a .08 BAC - to be far less sensible. "I could never drink two pints of beer then drive home like other people go ahead and do in England," says Larsson, who believes that more countries should adopt the Swedish standard.

There have been some U.S. attempts to toughen the drunk driving laws. Senators Tom Udall, a Democrat from New Mexico, and Bob Corker, a Republican from Tennessee, introduced the ROADS SAFE Act earlier this year. The name of the proposed legislation is an acronym for "Research of Alcohol Detection Systems for Stopping Alcohol-related Fatalities Everywhere." If enacted, it would authorize $12 million annual funding for five years to the NHTSA Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) program in order to develop technology within vehicles to keep intoxicated individuals from driving (pegged to the current .08 limit). What type of impact would this have? It is estimated that this technology could prevent 8,000 deaths yearly. Based on American averages, that would mean there would be roughly three hours between every drunk driving death, which is better than the current 45 minutes. However, the numbers will always be better in Sweden.

TIME


RELATED TOPIC
First of all, thank you for visiting this page.

This website is a non commercial website and therefore is not designed to gain profit. Running cost, however, has became my limitation in improving the site.If you like this website, you can help to make it better, click DONATE logo below:



Any amount of donation would be very important to the future of this site. Thank you for your help and support.

FULLSTORY...

Wednesday, 13 October 2010

Many Americans Plan to Skip Flu Shot This Year

0 comments

UNITED STATED

Although vaccination against influenza can protect people from illness and help prevent the spread of flu, many Americans say they and their children won't be getting a shot this coming season, new surveys reveal.

Despite the attention surrounding last year's outbreak of H1N1 flu, 43 percent of Americans say they will not be getting the vaccine this fall, according to a survey from the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID).

Another survey from the same group found a third of American mothers saying they have no plans to get a flu shot for their children.

Those decisions could come back to haunt Americans, experts said.

"Flu is serious. Every year millions of people get sick; more than 200,000 people are hospitalized and thousands of people die from influenza," Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said during a Thursday morning press conference. In keeping with CDC guidelines, "everyone over the age of 6 months should get a flu shot," he said.


Flu vaccination remains the best way to protect yourself against the illness, Frieden added.

"There is plenty of vaccine available," he said. "This year we think that the three strains of influenza in the flu vaccine are going to be excellent matches with the flu that's circulating."

This year's shot contains vaccine against the H1N1 pandemic flu that caused a major outbreak in the last flu season, Frieden noted.

"More than 119 million doses [of flu vaccine] have already been distributed in the United States. That's more than 30 million more doses than were distributed by this time last year," Dr. Daniel Jernigan, Deputy Director of CDC's Influenza Division, said during the press conference.

However, as important as flu vaccine is, many people still don't get vaccinated.

Flu expert Dr. Marc Siegel noted that many people who opt not to get a flu shot are falling prey to myths about the vaccine. "It's all because of this nonsense that's been circulating that somehow the flu shot is dangerous," he said. "The fear of the vaccine outweighs the fear of the disease and that's a huge mistake, because the disease is more dangerous than the vaccine."

In addition, children should be vaccinated not only so they won't get the flu, but so they can't spread it, Siegel, an associate professor of medicine at New York University, said. "Children don't have any immunity. They are super-spreaders of the flu," he explained.

According to the NFID telephone survey of more than 1,000 adults, conducted in late August, one big factor in deciding to get vaccinated is a doctor's recommendation. In addition, the desire to protect family members and not having to be laid up for a week were also reasons cited by most people who planned on getting the shot, the survey found.

In addition, 77 percent of Americans are aware that new recommendations support most people getting a flu shot and are planning to get vaccinated. And awareness of the vaccine's effectiveness does seem to boost acceptance, the survey found.

Among mothers, 80 percent said they had not changed their attitude about flu vaccine since last year's H1N1 scare and 65 percent do plan to have their children vaccinated. However, 33 percent don't plan on vaccinating their children, while 2 percent are undecided, according to the survey. The survey was conducted in mid-August and involved more than 600 mothers of children aged 6 to 18.

Among the 43 percent of Americans who don't plan on being vaccinated misconceptions -- and what the researchers call "magical thinking" -- were cited as reasons for not getting a shot. These include mistaken beliefs that there are other ways to protect yourself from flu (71 percent), or the belief that they are healthy and the flu "doesn't worry them" (69 percent).

About half of those who are balking at getting the shot worry that the vaccine may be harmful, while 62 percent believe that the vaccine actually gives you the flu (it doesn't) or side effects. Forty-eight percent don't believe the vaccine will match the flu that is circulating and so won't be effective.

Other misconceptions abound: According to the survey, 62 percent of all Americans mistakenly think the vaccine protects against just one strain of flu, and 34 percent think hand-washing is as effective as the vaccine in preventing influenza.

"The idea that you are not going to spread the flu by washing your hands has never been proven," Siegal noted.

The story is different for those folks charged with advising people on flu: doctors.

In a separate NFID online survey of 400 physicians, conducted in mid-September, an overwhelming 90 percent said they planned to get vaccinated. Three percent remained uncertain and less than 2 percent of doctors said they would not get vaccinated.

In addition, most doctors recommend flu shots to their families, friends and patients, the survey found.

According to NFID, each year flu causes more than 200,000 hospitalizations and between 3,330 and 49,000 deaths, depending on the severity of circulating strains. (HealthDay News)


RELATED TOPIC
First of all, thank you for visiting this page.

This website is a non commercial website and therefore is not designed to gain profit. Running cost, however, has became my limitation in improving the site.If you like this website, you can help to make it better, click DONATE logo below:



Any amount of donation would be very important to the future of this site. Thank you for your help and support.

FULLSTORY...

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

Retinal Disease Treatments for Elders Doubled Over 10 Years

0 comments

UNITED STATED

The number of older Americans undergoing treatment for retinal conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy nearly doubled between 1997 and 2007, with a significant shift in the types of procedures being performed, a new study has found.

Age-related macular degeneration is a progressive disease of the retina that causes the loss of central vision, and 40 percent of people with diabetes have some form of diabetic retinopathy, a condition in which blood vessels stop feeding the retina properly, according to the American Foundation for the Blind. Both conditions can cause vision loss and blindness.

The researchers analyzed Medicare data from 1997 to 2007 and found that the number of retinal procedures increased 192 percent during that period. The largest year-to-year increase (20 percent) occurred between 2006 and 2007, according to the study published in the October issue of the journal Archives of Ophthalmology.

The largest increase in volume was seen in treatments for neovascular, or "wet," AMD. New treatments for this condition include intravitreal therapy -- drug injections directly into the eye -- of antibodies that block the formation of new blood vessels. Between 1997 and 2001, fewer than 5,000 such injections were performed each year, but rates more than doubled each year through 2006. In 2007, there were 812,413 such injections, the study authors noted in a news release from the journal's publisher.

The use of photodynamic therapy -- a laser treatment for neovascular AMD -- peaked at 133,565 procedures in 2004 and then decreased 83 percent to 22,675 procedures in 2007. Laser treatment of potentially cancerous eye tumors and the "wet" form of AMD decreased from a peak of 82,089 in 1999 to 13,821 in 2007 (another 83 percent decrease), the researchers found.



Among the other findings:

* Use of vitrectomy -- surgery to remove the gel inside the eye in order to treat retinal detachment -- increased 72 percent between 1997 and 2007.
* The use of scleral buckling -- placement of a silicon buckle around the eye -- to treat retinal detachment decreased 69 percent between 1997 and 2007.

"Retinal disease is highly prevalent among older individuals, and both age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy account for more than half the irreversible blindness in older Americans. The prevalence of both macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy increases with age, and the number of Americans affected by these conditions is expected to increase substantially as the number of Americans older than 65 years doubles from 2010 to 2040," study author Dr. Pradeep Ramulu, of Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and colleagues wrote in the article.(HealthDay News)


RELATED TOPIC
First of all, thank you for visiting this page.

This website is a non commercial website and therefore is not designed to gain profit. Running cost, however, has became my limitation in improving the site.If you like this website, you can help to make it better, click DONATE logo below:



Any amount of donation would be very important to the future of this site. Thank you for your help and support.

FULLSTORY...

Special Report: Life and death in the age of the bionic heart

0 comments

UNITED STATED

In September 2007, Verna Schrombeck gathered three of her six children -- those who could bear it -- to discuss her funeral arrangements. She had been given just months to live and was about to undergo a last-ditch, cutting-edge heart surgery. There was no guarantee she would return home.

Had she organized things well enough, she wondered, so that her eldest son, who was in charge of the estate, would not be burdened? Had she taught her handicapped son, an adult, enough life skills to take care of himself? She asked that the Ave Maria be played at her funeral.

A week later, Verna's sister drove her 8 hours from Lowell, Indiana to Rochester, Minnesota, to the Mayo Clinic, one of the country's best hospitals for heart surgery. Her daughter flew in from Kansas. By the time Verna arrived at the hospital she could barely walk to the admissions desk. "I leaned over the railing, gasping for breath," she said. "I told my daughter, "you have to get me a wheelchair."

Verna, now 78, was suffering from heart failure, a progressive condition that, in its advanced stages, makes walking even a few feet difficult. She had received multiple treatments, including drugs and an implantable heart defibrillator, but nothing was working. In a final Hail Mary, doctors decided to implant an experimental, battery-powered mechanical heart pump known as a left ventricular assist device, or LVAD, into a cavity in her abdomen to assist her heart in pumping.



By the time she returned home, Verna, who received the device as part of a clinical trial, was able to dispense with her oxygen tank and take on household chores. Three years later, she is teaching piano to her five great-grandchildren, cooking meals for her family and driving by herself.

"It has transformed me," she said.

The device, called HeartMate II and made by Thoratec Corp, was approved by U.S. health regulators in 2008 to keep patients alive while they waited for a heart transplant. But in January, it was approved for permanent use in patients who are ineligible for a transplant, expanding the number of potential recipients from a few thousand to tens of thousands, and potentially changing the landscape for the treatment of end-stage heart failure.

"There has been a ten-fold increase in the use of these devices since they were approved for permanent use," said Dr. Lynne Warner Stevenson, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and director, Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. "We are going to know a lot more a year from now but my anticipation is that it will have been the approval of this device in January that will have really set the field in motion."

To survive, patients must be connected to a lead called a drive-line that runs from the LVAD out through the skin and to a power source. At night the drive-line is plugged into a base unit with a display screen that provides statistical data, which in turn is plugged into a wall socket. By day patients are powered by a set of rechargeable batteries, weighing six or seven pounds, that can be carried around in a bag, holster or vest. The batteries are connected to a controller the size of a paperback book that can be worn on a belt around the waist.

"We like to say I'm bionic," said Geri Norris, 63, a native of Bristol, England who now lives with her husband in Marlborough, Massachusetts.

She is one of the new crop of patients who will live with the device indefinitely. One big drawback, she jokes, is not being able to wear the clothes she likes.

"This is not exactly a fashion statement," she said ruefully, plucking at the light-blue L.L. Bean fishing vest that carries her equipment.

While powered by battery, patients can go about much of their daily lives. But being plugged into the wall at night, albeit with a cord long enough for a trip to the bathroom, takes some getting used to.

"You know how they tether dogs to a clothes line?" said Norris, with a laugh. "That's what it feels like."

AN UNNATURAL DEATH

The rise in use of mechanical heart devices represents a dramatic leap forward in the treatment of heart failure. But it also raises some potentially troubling ethical questions: these machines have the capacity to extend life beyond its natural cycle and beyond what might be desirable.

"This is one of the ways our technology has moved ahead of our humanity," said Stevenson. "We haven't had enough experience yet about how to help people die naturally who have a ventricular assist device. And I can tell you, it is difficult to die with one of these things in place. The body does not give up easily when the blood flow is maintained."

Not that patients don't die. Infections are a fairly common cause of death, as are bleeding and stroke. But death may not always come naturally. And decisions must be made about turning the device off.

"We have to address what is the meaning of death on one of these pumps," said Dr. Valluvan Jeevanandam, chief of cardiac and thoracic surgery at the University of Chicago Medical Center and an investigator for Thoratec's clinical trials.

Roughly 70 percent of patients on the HeartMate II were alive after a year, and nearly 60 percent were alive after two years, according to the latest data.

"It's not hard to imagine a person who has had severe stroke that has impacted both sides of the brain, the kidneys are shutting down, he is on a respirator, but yet the LVAD just keeps churning along," said Martin Smith, a clinical ethicist at the Cleveland Clinic.

Under U.S. law, patients are allowed to ask that implanted devices be turned off. But Dr. Diane Meier, a professor in the department of geriatrics and palliative medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, said cardiologists are particularly bad at preparing patients for death, especially this kind of death.

"The number of consults that the palliative team gets from cardiologists can be measured on one hand," she said. "We are called upon much more frequently by physicians in other disciplines."

HOLY GRAIL

Still, LVADs are improving the quality of life for hundreds of patients, including Dick Cheney, the former vice president of the United States and a multiple heart attack survivor. Moreover, the importance of LVAD technology goes beyond its impact on existing patients. It provides a platform for research into stem cell and other therapies designed to regenerate a patient's own heart.

"The Holy Grail is for a sick patient to get a pump, which immediately helps," said Dr. Randall Starling, Head of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. "Then we inject his own stem cells -- maybe in one shot or over the course of a year -- then he improves and his heart recovers, and then he has the pump removed."

LVADs have made regenerative therapy research -- the new science that uses stem cells to generate new organs and tissue -- much easier, since the risk of hurting a patient is minimal. The LVAD carries out the heart's main pumping function, no matter what research is conducted on the patient's own heart. Once the patient undergoes a transplant, the treated native heart, with its cells and its genes, can be examined and studied.

"In five years, we will have some fairly substantial number of patients treated and followed for a couple of years," said Dr. Leslie W. Miller, director of the University of South Florida's Cardiovascular Clinical and Research Integrated Strategic Program.

These advances may never materialize, or they could be years down the road. Even so, early data have proved promising and young patients who are scheduled to receive a transplant might consider postponing the procedure, which is irreversible, Miller said.

"Maybe a mechanical pump is a better five to 10 year solution for these people because we hope to be in a better place by that time with stem cell technology and other regenerative models," he said. "Transplant survival at one year is 85 to 88 percent, and 60 to 65 percent at five years, and I think we can have these kind of figures with these devices."

CRAZY ROBOTIC HEART

Daniel Roth, who just turned 23, is one of the young people faced with such a decision. Since receiving his LVAD a year and a half ago, he has lived an active life. He works in a hospital, exercises and plays in a rock band -- Teamwork. He is determined to get a transplant.

"I could wait five years and hope stem cell therapy will work but by then I'm nearly 30 and I have things I want to do," he said. "I want to be a musician, and go on tour. I would sacrifice some years off the end of my life -- not too many -- for the years left to be as awesome as they can be."

Roth says he has been told transplant patients can expect to live 20 to 25 years, but Dr. Mark Slaughter, professor and chief of the division of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery at the University of Louisville is not so sanguine.

"The survival rate at one year is more than 80 percent," he said, "but after that there is a 4 percent decline every year, so that in 20 years everyone is dead. You have a very finite timeline."

Roth, who lives with his parents in Norwood, Massachusetts, became ill in late 2006 with stomach pains and shortness of breath, while studying marine biology at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island. In January, 2007, he had a stroke. He was diagnosed with an enlarged heart and placed on the list for a transplant.

For the next two years he returned repeatedly to the hospital with symptoms such as vomiting, fluid retention and shortness of breath. A defibrillator was implanted.

"I became very depressed and docile," said Roth, who these days brims with optimism and energy. "Playing in my band took every last ounce of strength."

He struggled on, with medications, but in early 2009 he caught a stomach bug that he could not shake. He returned to the hospital. While there, his heart stopped.

"He coded for about six minutes," said his mother, Ellen, tearfully.

Emergency workers revived him, but by that time he was too ill for transplant surgery.

Even if he had been physically fitter, there is no guarantee a donor heart would have been available. It is estimated that some 50,000 people around the world are candidates for heart transplant, but only 5,000 patients per year get them.

"The only option for me was this crazy robotic heart," he said. It was implanted in April 2009.

"That summer was amazing," he said. "I traveled with my band, I did everything. I didn't realize how sick I was until I got this thing."

Now he is eligible once again for a transplant. And he wants one. He wants to be free of the encumbrances of the LVAD, the endless changing of the batteries, the fear that the wiring might "crap out," that a power outage might hit. He remembers vividly a fourth of July weekend away with friends in Maine. A fuse in the old house they were staying in blew and cut all power. "It was like a bad movie, where the clock starts ticking on your life," he said.

A flurry of calls to doctors and nearby hospitals led him to Maine Medical Center in Portland, which had an extra base unit. But he fears that if he is on tour in a remote part of the country, or overseas, he may not be so lucky.

To get his heart transplant, Roth needs to manage his weight -- one of his biggest challenges -- since one of the criteria for matching a donor heart with a recipient is weight class. A heart donated by a 150-pound woman won't support a 280-pound man.

"I'm doing well now, I've lost 25 pounds, and after the transplant I'll be an angel," he said ebulliently.

EXPANDING MARKET

In addition to regenerative medicine coming down the pike, new generations of LVADs are also in development.

The HeartMate II is a third-generation device and a vast improvement over its predecessor, the HeartMate XVE, which was so large it could not be used in small women, and noisy enough to be disconcerting both to the patient and those around him.

Dan Mooney, who had a long history of heart attacks and had several bypass surgeries by the time he was 53, received a prior generation LVAD in early 2002 -- shortly after 9/11 -- and survived on it for about 14 months, according to his widow, Cathy. But people found him scary.

"He would get into an elevator, with his fishing vest and all these wires coming out, and he was ticking," she said. "In public he scared people half to death."

The HeartMate II, by contrast, is quiet. It pumps blood on a continuous basis, which eliminates the pulse.

Currently, the HeartMate II dominates the market. But a rival company, HeartWare International Inc, of Framingham, Massachusetts, is developing a smaller device that some experts believe could, if approved as expected by early 2012, gain significant market share and possibly eclipse the HeartMate II.

"I think the market overall is going to be very substantial, but I do think that ultimately HeartWare has a better product, so if that's the case, why not try and bet on the best in class technology," said Kris Jenner, a portfolio manager at T-Rowe Price Healthcare Sciences Fund. Jenner expects the market for ventricular assist devices to be worth as much as $1 billion in five years time.

Still, HeartWare CEO Douglas Godshall is cautious about building expectations too high.

"We have certain advantages over Thoratec -- our device is smaller and can be placed in the chest rather than a pocket in the abdomen, which physicians like, and it's a faster procedure," he said. "But it is not an insignificant advantage to already have approval and be on the market and have had a chance to work out a lot of your kinks. We are just finding out what our kinks are."

Larry Feinberg, who runs Oracle Investment Management and holds shares in Thoratec, said he believes both companies will be winners over the long term.

"I don't think there will be one dominant player and the other falls by the wayside," he said. "I see it more as being a pretty close horse race, with each technological advance causing each to leapfrog the other. There are very high expectations for HeartWare. If their data isn't perfect the stock could get really slammed."

Results of HeartWare's pivotal ADVANCE Bridge-to-Transplant Trial will be presented at this year's annual American Heart Association meeting in November and both physicians and Wall Street analysts expect positive results.

Estimates vary as to the ultimate number of people who could benefit from the device, with some predicting 30,000 and others more than 100,000.

How far the market expands will likely depend on whether the device is used to treat patients at an earlier stage of their disease, in the hope of staving off a worsening of symptoms. Stevenson, the Harvard professor, said there is a "spirited" debate occurring in the medical community about the merits of this.

"Risks that seem very reasonable for somebody who has a miserable quality of life at home may be less reasonable if we have somebody who doesn't feel all that bad at home," said Stevenson. "We don't really have much data at all beyond two years. And we're already finding some surprises that are not such happy news."

In particular, she said, physicians are finding that there is more bleeding and a different kind of bleeding -- much of it in the colon, stomach and nose -- than seen with Thoratec's earlier device, the HeartMate XVE.

"Right now we're all waiting to see how much more that's going to be," she said.

Thoratec Chief Executive Gary Burbach said the company is studying the problem, which appears with the continuous flow pump technology and is thought to somehow cause a disruption in the complex blood clotting process. Thoratec will continue to develop its pumps based on the current technology, he said, and doctors can manage the bleeding with medication.

BREAKING FREE FROM THE WIRE

Experts agree that there will be an advantage to whichever company can dispense with the external drive-line so that the entire system, including batteries and controller, are beneath the skin and power is transmitted across the skin.

"I'm a believer that the percutaneous drive-line ultimately needs to go away," said Slaughter, the University of Louisville professor who is co-principal investigator on HeartWare's bridge-to-transplant trial.

Totally implantable LVAD technology -- known as transcutaneous energy transmission systems (TETS) -- are not new. But before being clinically useful the technology and battery life need to be improved, said Slaughter.

"If you wanted a TET system from which you could disconnect for 15 to 20 minutes a day, you could have one in six months," he said.

That might give a patient the chance to jump in a shower but probably would not be worth the more complicated surgery. If a patient could be disconnected for two hours a day -- enough to swim, relax in a hot tub, or be intimate with a partner -- that could significantly increase their quality of life.

"If you want to be disconnected for one hour twice a day, I think that could be doable within the next two years," Slaughter said.

Thoratec has its sights set on developing a totally implantable device, with no drive-line and longer-running batteries within five years, Burbach said.

It is still unclear how long the devices will keep patients alive. Experts say they could last as long as 10 years.

Verna Schrombeck, for one, has come to terms with the uncertainty. "There is a tranquility that one has," she said. "You've fought your battles, and you've learned to accept life as it is now -- lightning bugs, the fireflies, the deer that come up and stand on their hind legs as they grab the apples. We don't know where this is going to lead. But that's true of everyone's life." (Reporting by Toni Clarke and Debra Sherman; Editing by Jim Impoco and Claudia Parsons)


RELATED TOPIC
First of all, thank you for visiting this page.

This website is a non commercial website and therefore is not designed to gain profit. Running cost, however, has became my limitation in improving the site.If you like this website, you can help to make it better, click DONATE logo below:



Any amount of donation would be very important to the future of this site. Thank you for your help and support.

FULLSTORY...

GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE
Custom Search
 
Minima 4 coloum Blogger Template by Beloon-Online.
Simplicity Edited by Ipiet's Template